netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] arch: Add lightweight memory barriers for coherent memory access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxE-zT9De8A-nwqtPiVn2ON19go76ui6buYskOU3L3a7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:33:32 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, matthew.vick@...el.com,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	nic_swsd@...ltek.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] arch: Add lightweight memory barriers for coherent
 memory access

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> I have no problem taking this via my tree, but I want to see agreement
> from other interested parties.

Since the early users are network drivers, and since it's otherwise
cross-architecture and not clear under any other maintainership, that
sounds good to me.

The arch parts were, I think, largely uncontroversial once naming and
a couple of small arch details were fixed up, so I don't think there's
any problem there.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html