[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54931283.1030804@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:44:35 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] net-PPP: Deletion of a few unnecessary checks
>> Now I find still that your data reorgansisation wish can not be resolved
>> in a simple way.
>
> I'm saying to leave the code alone.
It seems that there might be a misunderstanding between us.
> If it goes:
>
> var = foo_that_returns_ptr_err()
> if (IS_ERR(var))
> return PTR_ERR(var);
>
> p->bar = var;
>
> or whatever, simply keep it that way!
A simple return was not used by the mppe_alloc() function so far because
a bit of memory clean-up will also be useful after error detection,
won't it?
> I'm not engaging in this conversation any further, you have already
> consumed way too much of my limited time on this incredibly trivial matter.
It can occasionally happen that a safe clarification of specific implementation
details will need more efforts than you would like to invest at the moment.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists