lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLKFFP4605fuirsU7KUf6te7U2_0-WcMj8ijwmfJ7oGog@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:39:42 -0800
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>
> Would you like something like this?

yes. imo this version is much easier to read
and reason about different bits in protocol.

May be even use a flag mask on '__be32 vx_flags'
instead of calling out 'gbp_present' as explicit bitfield.
Then different vxlan extensions proposals don't
have to fight over positions in the first byte of
single 'struct vxlanhdr'...
but to me the below two structs look good as-is.

>  struct vxlanhdr_gbp {
>         __u8 vx_flags;
> +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
> +       __u8    reserved_flags1:3,
> +               policy_applied:1,
> +               reserved_flags2:2,
> +               dont_learn:1,
> +               reserved_flags3:1;
> +#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> +       __u8    reserved_flags1:1,
> +               dont_learn:1,
> +               reserved_flags2:2,
> +               policy_applied:1,
> +               reserved_flags3:3;
> +#else
> +#error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
> +#endif
> +       __be16 policy_id;
> +       __be32  vx_vni;
>  };
>
>  struct vxlanhdr {
> +       union {
> +               struct {
> +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
> +                       __u8    reserved_flags1:3,
> +                               vni_present:1,
> +                               reserved_flags2:3,
> +                               gbp_present:1;
> +#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> +                       __u8    gbp_present:1,
> +                               reserved_flags2:3,
> +                               vni_present:1,
> +                               reserved_flags1:3;
> +#else
> +#error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
> +#endif
> +                       __u8    vx_reserved1;
> +                       __be16  vx_reserved2;
> +               };
> +               __be32 vx_flags;
> +       };
> +       __be32  vx_vni;
>  };
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ