[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx8SWiwjBfxx05omur1gDeF9QcKtjDKJQ+XdUgi_U8LWig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:14:57 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index f7d0d2d..9f07bf5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -370,10 +370,18 @@ enum {
> IFLA_VXLAN_UDP_CSUM,
> IFLA_VXLAN_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX,
> IFLA_VXLAN_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX,
> + IFLA_VXLAN_EXTENSION,
> __IFLA_VXLAN_MAX
> };
> #define IFLA_VXLAN_MAX (__IFLA_VXLAN_MAX - 1)
>
> +enum {
> + IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_UNSPEC,
> + IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_GBP,
> + __IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_MAX,
> +};
> +#define IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_MAX (__IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_MAX - 1)
> +
Creating a level of indirection for extensions seems overly
complicated to me. Why not just define IFLA_VXLAN_GBP as just another
enum above?
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists