[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113010357.GB20387@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:03:57 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vxlan: Group Policy extension
On 01/12/15 at 10:14am, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > index f7d0d2d..9f07bf5 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > @@ -370,10 +370,18 @@ enum {
> > IFLA_VXLAN_UDP_CSUM,
> > IFLA_VXLAN_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX,
> > IFLA_VXLAN_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX,
> > + IFLA_VXLAN_EXTENSION,
> > __IFLA_VXLAN_MAX
> > };
> > #define IFLA_VXLAN_MAX (__IFLA_VXLAN_MAX - 1)
> >
> > +enum {
> > + IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_UNSPEC,
> > + IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_GBP,
> > + __IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_MAX,
> > +};
> > +#define IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_MAX (__IFLA_VXLAN_EXT_MAX - 1)
> > +
>
> Creating a level of indirection for extensions seems overly
> complicated to me. Why not just define IFLA_VXLAN_GBP as just another
> enum above?
I think it's cleaner to group them in a nested attribute.
It clearly separates the optional extensions from the base
attributes. RCO, GPE, GBP can all live in there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists