[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150115025539.GA20315@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:55:39 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.ne>, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vxlan: Group Policy extension
On 01/15/15 at 01:28am, Thomas Graf wrote:
> What exactly is the problem of having a distinct bitmap used by
> extensions? It is the least error prone method because it's clear that
> all extensions must match and we don't have to maintain an additional
> bitmask which can be forgotten to be updated.
>
> If you need to compare additional receive checksum settings for RCO
> then that should be separate because as you say it's not an extension.
Tom,
OK. I have changed it to use flags instead of exts in v6. You should
be able to add whatever RCO flags need to be matched in
vxlan_find_sock() to the VXLAN_F_UNSHAREABLE bitmask.
Hope this makes everybody happy ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists