[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx8S8FcJrOdPgTC7oRcSyayQLox=SRc3-N1YQ5+VoVWbyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:59:58 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.ne>, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vxlan: Group Policy extension
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> On 01/15/15 at 01:28am, Thomas Graf wrote:
>> What exactly is the problem of having a distinct bitmap used by
>> extensions? It is the least error prone method because it's clear that
>> all extensions must match and we don't have to maintain an additional
>> bitmask which can be forgotten to be updated.
>>
>> If you need to compare additional receive checksum settings for RCO
>> then that should be separate because as you say it's not an extension.
>
> Tom,
>
> OK. I have changed it to use flags instead of exts in v6. You should
> be able to add whatever RCO flags need to be matched in
> vxlan_find_sock() to the VXLAN_F_UNSHAREABLE bitmask.
>
> Hope this makes everybody happy ;-)
Awesome. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists