netdev - Re: [PATCH] ethernet: fm10k: Actually drop 4 bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87twzhknnl.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:	Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:50:06 +0100
From:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:	"Vick\, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>
Cc:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	"Kirsher\, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"e1000-devel\@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethernet: fm10k: Actually drop 4 bits

On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com> wrote:

> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to address
> this.
>
> The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an invalid
> VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was
> invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's
> alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via your
> Reported-by.

Sure, do what you think is best.

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html