lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D0EBB1E6.6855F%matthew.vick@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:58:13 +0000
From:	"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
CC:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethernet: fm10k: Actually drop 4 bits

On 1/23/15, 4:50 PM, "Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:

>On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to
>>address
>> this.
>>
>> The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an
>>invalid
>> VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was
>> invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's
>> alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via
>>your
>> Reported-by.
>
>Sure, do what you think is best.
>
>Rasmus

Sounds good. I'll get the patch created and validated through Jeff's tree.

Cheers,
Matthew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ