netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: use SACK RTTs for CC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:47:36 -0800
From:	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
To:	Kenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@....uio.no>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: use SACK RTTs for CC

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kenneth Klette Jonassen
> <kennetkl@....uio.no> wrote:
>> Current behavior only passes RTTs from sequentially acked data to CC.
>>
>> If sender gets a combined ACK for segment 1 and SACK for segment 3, then the
>> computed RTT for CC is the time between sending segment 1 and receiving SACK
>> for segment 3.
> since segment 3 is sent after segment 1, sack_rtt_us <= ca_seq_rtt so
> taking a min is not necessary?
ah i didn't notice you are taking a min_t of ulong for invalid
sack_rtt_us now i get it.


>
>>
>> Pass the minimum computed RTT from any acked data to CC, i.e. time between
>> sending segment 3 and receiving SACK for segment 3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@....uio.no>
>> ---
>>  net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> index 71fb37c..ed11931 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> @@ -3183,8 +3183,10 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, int prior_fackets,
>>
>>                 tp->fackets_out -= min(pkts_acked, tp->fackets_out);
>>
>> -               if (ca_ops->pkts_acked)
>> -                       ca_ops->pkts_acked(sk, pkts_acked, ca_seq_rtt_us);
>> +               if (ca_ops->pkts_acked) {
>> +                       long rtt_us = min_t(ulong, ca_seq_rtt_us, sack_rtt_us);
>> +                       ca_ops->pkts_acked(sk, pkts_acked, rtt_us);
>> +               }
>>
>>         } else if (skb && rtt_update && sack_rtt_us >= 0 &&
>>                    sack_rtt_us > skb_mstamp_us_delta(&now, &skb->skb_mstamp)) {
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html