netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/9] nftables: reject NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150130175525.GA8670@acer.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:55:26 +0000
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, tgraf@...g.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
	David.Laight@...LAB.COM, ying.xue@...driver.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] nftables: reject NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL_END flag for
 non-interval sets

On 30.01, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> Unless you have any concern, I'm going to apply this and 8/9 to
> nf-next, so you don't need to resend these two sanitization fixes.

This one is not needed for mainline so far since nft_hash validates
on its own. It is only required since my series centralizes that
validation once the set extensions are added.

For 8/9, sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html