netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/9] nftables: reject NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150130180021.GA12318@salvia>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:00:21 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, tgraf@...g.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
	David.Laight@...LAB.COM, ying.xue@...driver.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] nftables: reject NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL_END flag for
 non-interval sets

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:55:26PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 30.01, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> > 
> > Unless you have any concern, I'm going to apply this and 8/9 to
> > nf-next, so you don't need to resend these two sanitization fixes.
> 
> This one is not needed for mainline so far since nft_hash validates
> on its own. It is only required since my series centralizes that
> validation once the set extensions are added.
> 
> For 8/9, sure.

OK, I'll take 8/9 then, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html