[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54CD5529.5060209@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:20:25 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: One function call less in em_meta_change()
after error detection
>> I find that all these cases correspond to the current Linux coding
>> style documentation, doesn't it?
>
> Sure, I think it does.
Thanks for your acknowledgement.
> But it was not coding style violation what I was reffering to.
Do you suggest any fine-tuning for the affected documentation
so that I would tweak my update suggestion once more?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists