netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sched: One function call less in em_meta

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54CD5C6D.2040704@gmx.de>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:51:25 +0100
From:	Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: One function call less in em_meta_change()
 after error detection

On 31.01.2015 23:20, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> I find that all these cases correspond to the current Linux coding
>>> style documentation, doesn't it?
>> 
>> Sure, I think it does.
> 
> Thanks for your acknowledgement.
> 
> 
>> But it was not coding style violation what I was reffering to.
> 
> Do you suggest any fine-tuning for the affected documentation
> so that I would tweak my update suggestion once more?
> 

No I dont think that any documentation has to be adjusted. If you agree
with me you should adjust the patch accordingly and resend it. Otherwise
keep it as it is.

Regards,
Lino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html