netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] rhashtable: require max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:22:41 +0000
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:	Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rhashtable: require max_shift definition

On 02/10/15 at 06:06pm, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hm, given that min_shift/max_shift are parameters that directly
> concern internals of rhashtable i.e. are tightly coupled to expand
> and shrink functionality, I'd say that depending on the use case,
> a maxelem limit should rather be handled outside of it, if it's
> truly an issue/concern.

Agreed, Netlink already uses the atomic counter of rhashtable to
enforce  upper limit of table entries:

        err = -ENOMEM;
        if (BITS_PER_LONG > 32 &&
            unlikely(atomic_read(&table->hash.nelems) >= UINT_MAX))
                goto err;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html