[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1423589555.28434.36.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:32:35 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: udp v6 early demux?
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 12:14 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Hi
>
> While testing udpv6 lockless path, I noticed that there is no
> support for udpv6 early demux? Is there a technical reason why,
> or was this just something that got forgotten (kind of like
> lockeless sendmsg)?
If you have a use case for connected UDP ipv6 flows with performance
issues, then you might add early demux I guess.
IPv4 udp early demux has been a bit of a hack actually,
as Shawn main usage was multicast AFAIK
63c6f81cdde5 udp: ipv4: do not waste time in __udp4_lib_mcast_demux_lookup
610438b74496 udp: ipv4: fix potential use after free in udp_v4_early_demux()
f69b923a758f udp: fix a typo in __udp4_lib_mcast_demux_lookup
421b3885bf6d udp: ipv4: Add udp early demux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists