Message-ID: <20150220000935.GA30118@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:09:35 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
	jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com, andrew@...n.ch,
	cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: implement HW bridging
 operations

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:50:53PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 19/02/15 09:46, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:27:23AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 18/02/15 21:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:48:19PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>> On 17/02/15 11:26, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>>> Update the Broadcom Starfighter 2 switch driver to implement the
> >>>>> join/leave/stp_update callbacks required for basic hardware bridging
> >>>>> support.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is not much to be done at the driver level but translating the
> >>>>> STP state from Linux to their HW values.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joining a bridge means that the joining port and the other port members
> >>>>> need to be in the same VLAN membership as the CPU, while leaving the
> >>>>> bridge puts the port back into a separate VLAN membership with only the
> >>>>> CPU.
> >>>>
> >>>> I found a couple additional issues while testing:
> >>>>
> >>>> - manipulating UP/DOWN state of interfaces that are part of a bridge
> >>>> would not restore their bridge membership
> >>>>
> >>>> - removing an interface from a bridge and bringing it back up would
> >>>> leave it in blocked state
> >>>>
> >>> Is this a problem with your implementation for sf2 or a generic problem
> >>> with the first patch, such as some missing state transitions ?
> >>
> >> This is more of a side effect of having HW (an Ethernet switch) that can
> >> really block a given port, based on last night's discussion with Roopa,
> >> we can either fix this at the DSA level (in our case) or better fix this
> >> at the bridge layer, I will propose a fix for this shortly.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> For sf2, you might have to set the port state as well as the bridge
> >>> association in the port_setup function. That is of course just a
> >>> wild guess.
> >>
> >> Right, that's what I ended up doing. Thanks!
> > 
> > Great.
> > 
> > Another question: How do you handle flushing the forwarding database ?
> > 
> > My current code for mv88e6352 flushes the forwarding database for a bridge
> > group if the port association for that group changes (whenever a port joins
> > or leaves a group, or whenever the state of a port in a group changes).
> > There is, however, another situation where the forwarding database may
> > have to be flushed - essentially on each topology change.
> > 
> > How do you handle this situation ? Is it a real problem or do I just
> > imagine that it is ?
> 
> This is a real problem, for once I was working under the assumption that
> the SF2 hardware was doing an automatic FDB flushing, but after
> re-reading the documentation, this is not the case. My lab network does
> not have many stations and I certainly did not catch that case.

The rocker code implements the fdb flush operation pretty much the same
way I do, so I seem to be doing something right.

Not sure yet what to do about setting the fdb aging time. I don't see a
mechanism to do that. No idea how important that is.

I think we'll also need support for ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid, ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid,
ndo_fdb_add, ndo_fdb_del, and ndo_fdb_dump. Have you thought about those ?

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists