netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] tun: change speed from 10M to dynamically configured

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:41:31 -0500
From:	Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	stephen@...workplumber.org, Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com,
	romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com,
	jasowang@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, jonathon.reinhart@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tun: change speed from 10M to dynamically configured

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:40:41PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:03:45 -0500
> 
> > I would like to propose this is as a more complete alternative.
> > 
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workpluber.org>
> > Subject: [PATCH] tun: support overriding ethtool information
> > 
> > Extensions to allow masqurade of ethtool info and device statistics.
> > This is useful to provide correct information to SNMP and OSPF routing
> > daemons when doing hw/sw offload of network device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> 
> We need a consistent policy regarding link attributes of encapsulating
> "software" devices.
> 
> I see three realistic options:
> 
> 1) Create a link state indication which means "I am a software device,
>    so I don't really have a link state in the traditional sense"
> 
> 2) Don't implement the link set/get operations at all on software
>    devices.
> 
>    People can use ETHTOOL_GLINK to see if the thing is "up"
> 
> 3) Propagate the ultimate physical transport parameters into what
>    the software device advertises.
> 
> It's important to carefully pick one of these, and consistently apply
> it to all of our software devices.
> 
> I don't want TUN doing one thing, ipv4 tunnels doing another, etc.

I am wondering if/how you see 3 playing out with e.g. ipv4 tunnels.
It seems to me there may be a consistent underlying device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html