[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8e1d6d2ffb44eac6518f435a044dbc6c0fd754ae.1424463131.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:14:21 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: tgraf@...g.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net] rhashtable: don't allocate ht structure on stack in test_rht_init
With object runtime debugging enabled, the rhashtable test suite
will rightfully throw a warning "ODEBUG: object is on stack, but
not annotated" from rhashtable_init().
This is because run_work is (correctly) being initialized via
INIT_WORK(), and not annotated by INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(). Meaning,
rhashtable_init() is okay as is, we just need to move ht e.g.,
into global scope.
It never triggered anything, since test_rhashtable is rather a
controlled environment and effectively runs to completion, so
that stack memory is not vanishing underneath us, we shouldn't
confuse any testers with it though.
Fixes: 7e1e77636e36 ("lib: Resizable, Scalable, Concurrent Hash Table")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
lib/test_rhashtable.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_rhashtable.c b/lib/test_rhashtable.c
index 9c5fcce..58b9953 100644
--- a/lib/test_rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/test_rhashtable.c
@@ -191,9 +191,10 @@ error:
return err;
}
+static struct rhashtable ht;
+
static int __init test_rht_init(void)
{
- struct rhashtable ht;
struct rhashtable_params params = {
.nelem_hint = TEST_HT_SIZE,
.head_offset = offsetof(struct test_obj, node),
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists