[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALnjE+pFZUqNbLpNwJOY8uoQ3f5bt3REQw+Y_o7uKGzWfvWWPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:55:11 -0800
From: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To: Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
Assaf Muller <amuller@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] openvswitch: Fix net exit.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>> Open vSwitch allows moving internal vport to different namespace
>> while still connected to the bridge. But when namespace deleted
>> OVS does not detach these vports, that results in dangling
>> pointer to netdevice which causes kernel panic as follows.
>> This issue is fixed by detaching all ovs ports from the deleted
>> namespace at net-exit.
>>
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028
>> IP: [<ffffffffa0aadaa5>] ovs_vport_locate+0x35/0x80 [openvswitch]
>> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffffa0aa6391>] lookup_vport+0x21/0xd0 [openvswitch]
>> [<ffffffffa0aa65f9>] ovs_vport_cmd_get+0x59/0xf0 [openvswitch]
>> [<ffffffff8167e07c>] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x1bc/0x3e0
>> [<ffffffff8167e319>] genl_rcv_msg+0x79/0xc0
>> [<ffffffff8167d919>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xb9/0xe0
>> [<ffffffff8167deac>] genl_rcv+0x2c/0x40
>> [<ffffffff8167cffd>] netlink_unicast+0x12d/0x1c0
>> [<ffffffff8167d3da>] netlink_sendmsg+0x34a/0x6b0
>> [<ffffffff8162e140>] sock_sendmsg+0xa0/0xe0
>> [<ffffffff8162e5e8>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x408/0x420
>> [<ffffffff8162f541>] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
>> [<ffffffff8162f592>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
>> [<ffffffff81764ee9>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
>>
>> Reported-by: Assaf Muller <amuller@...hat.com>
>> Fixes: 46df7b81454("openvswitch: Add support for network namespaces.")
>> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
>
> Would a similar issue exist for veth type of device?
> After cleaning up the vports, would user space still make reference to ports?
veth devices are of netdev type and are handled correctly on net exit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists