[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E6A11A.2060703@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:51:06 -0800
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com, cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: implement HW bridging operations
On 2/19/15, 6:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Remember that we are dealing with hardware switch chips. Those chips
>>> won't time out fdb entries just because the kernel's bridge driver
>>> thinks that it should.
>> Oh, they dont..?
> To some extent, it is better to think of these as two switches
> connected to each other, not one switch. The HW switch needs help with
> STP, but otherwise it is a fully functional and autonomous switch.
yes, exactly.
>
> This is going to make displaying the forwarding database interesting,
> because the SW bridge fdb and the HW bridge fdb are each subsets of
> the big picture and possible even contradictory since they are not
> updated atomically.
>
What we do on our switches is,
- disable SW bridge learning
- enable HW bridge learning
- we keep the SW bridge fdb in sync with the HW fdb, which leads to:
- HW learnt entries are pushed to SW bridge fdb
- SW static fdb entries (added by the user) are pushed to HW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists