lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1424985570-19193-1-git-send-email-george.mccollister@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:19:30 -0600
From:	George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, mugunthanvnm@...com, balbi@...com,
	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca, tony@...mide.com, mpa@...gutronix.de,
	jhovold@...il.com, george.cherian@...com, tklauser@...tanz.ch,
	George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] drivers: net: cpsw: Set SECURE for dual_emac ucast

Prior to this patch, sending a packet with the source MAC address of one
of the CPSW interfaces to one of the CPSW slave ports while it's configured in
dual_emac mode would update the port_num field of the VLAN/Unicast Address
Table Entry. This would cause it to discard all incoming traffic addressed to
that MAC address, essentially rendering the port useless until the ALE table is
cleared (by starting and stopping the interface or rebooting.)

For example, if eth0 has a MAC address of 90:59:af:8f:43:e9 it will have
an ALE table entry:

00 00 00 00 59 90 02 30 e9 43 8f af
(VLAN Addr vlan_id=2 unicast type=0 port_num=0 addr=90:59:af:8f:43:e9)

If you configure another device with the same MAC address and connect it
to the first CPSW slave port and send some traffic the ALE table entry
becomes:

04 00 00 00 59 90 02 30 e9 43 8f af
(VLAN Addr vlan_id=2 unicast type=0 port_num=1 addr=90:59:af:8f:43:e9)

>From this point forward all incoming traffic addressed to
90:59:af:8f:43:e9 will be dropped.

Setting the SECURE bit for the VLAN/Unicast address table entry for each
interface's MAC address corrects the problem.

Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 7d8dd0d..49b0336 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static inline void cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(
 	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
 			   port_mask, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
 	cpsw_ale_add_ucast(priv->ale, priv->mac_addr,
-		priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan);
+		priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN | ALE_SECURE, slave->port_vlan);
 }
 
 static void soft_reset_slave(struct cpsw_slave *slave)
-- 
2.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ