netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ebpf: move CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL-only function declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150302.150926.1234952192013427595.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:09:26 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:	ast@...mgrid.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ebpf: move CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL-only function
 declarations

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Mon,  2 Mar 2015 15:21:55 +0100

> Masami noted that it would be better to hide the remaining CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL-only
> function declarations within the BPF header ifdef, w/o else path dummy alternatives
> since these functions are not supposed to have a user outside of CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.
> 
> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Reference: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.api/8658
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html