netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] switchdev: don't support custom ip rules, for now

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150302.151023.1951758875495736687.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:10:23 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	sfeldma@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] switchdev: don't support custom ip
 rules, for now

From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:36:15 -0800

> On 3/2/15, 2:06 AM, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>>
>> Keep switchdev FIB offload model simple for now and don't allow custom
>> ip
>> rules.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> 
> I don't see a need to do this. And seems very aggressive.
> Also, note that the rules in a system can be on non-hw accelerated
> ports.
> 
> Until rules are hw accelerated, its ok to document this limitation for
> hw accelerated routes in my opinion.

No, we absolutely must start with a simple model that doesn't try
at all to offload if any FIB rules are installed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html