[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:03:17 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: johannes@...solutions.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/14] wireless: Use eth_<foo>_addr instead of
memset
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:57 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
>
> > Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
> > way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
> > which don't.
>
> You can't apply "this" without the dependency patch #1.
>
> Therefore this should probably all go through my tree.
Hey David.
The eth_<foo>_addr functions already exist so
1/14 isn't a dependency.
It's just a trivial improvement on existing code
with CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and
at least the arm 4.6.3 compiler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists