netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] bonding: implement bond_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1425557425.3164.55.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:10:25 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Cc:	Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] bonding: implement bond_poll_controller()

On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 18:26 -0800, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> This patches implements the poll_controller support for all
> bonding driver. If the slaves have poll_controller net_op defined,
> this implementation calls them. This is mode agnostic implementation
> and iterates through all slaves (based on mode) and calls respective
> handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index af5908a2190c..cbf77d388f53 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -928,6 +928,39 @@ static inline void slave_disable_netpoll(struct slave *slave)
>  
>  static void bond_poll_controller(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>  {
> +	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> +	struct slave *slave = NULL;
> +	struct list_head *iter;
> +	struct ad_info ad_info;
> +	struct netpoll_info *ni;
> +	const struct net_device_ops *ops;
> +
> +	if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
> +		if (bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info))
> +			return;

I don't think you need all that information...

> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
> +		ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops;
> +		if (!bond_slave_is_up(slave) || !ops->ndo_poll_controller)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> +			struct aggregator *agg =
> +			    SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port.aggregator;
> +
> +			if (agg &&
> +			    agg->aggregator_identifier != ad_info.aggregator_id)
> +				continue;

I think this could be:

			if (!(agg && agg->is_active))
				continue;

Ben.

> +		}
> +
> +		ni = rcu_dereference_bh(slave->dev->npinfo);
> +		if (down_trylock(&ni->dev_lock))
> +			continue;
> +		ops->ndo_poll_controller(slave->dev);
> +		up(&ni->dev_lock);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
>  
>  static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)