[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF2d9jjH-8FkZwkNPF3iC=3cVLnGi739amwchWZ7hRqHj_DeJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:37:42 -0800
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] bonding: implement bond_poll_controller()
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 18:26 -0800, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
>> This patches implements the poll_controller support for all
>> bonding driver. If the slaves have poll_controller net_op defined,
>> this implementation calls them. This is mode agnostic implementation
>> and iterates through all slaves (based on mode) and calls respective
>> handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index af5908a2190c..cbf77d388f53 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -928,6 +928,39 @@ static inline void slave_disable_netpoll(struct slave *slave)
>>
>> static void bond_poll_controller(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>> {
>> + struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
>> + struct slave *slave = NULL;
>> + struct list_head *iter;
>> + struct ad_info ad_info;
>> + struct netpoll_info *ni;
>> + const struct net_device_ops *ops;
>> +
>> + if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
>> + if (bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info))
>> + return;
>
> I don't think you need all that information...
>
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
>> + ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops;
>> + if (!bond_slave_is_up(slave) || !ops->ndo_poll_controller)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
>> + struct aggregator *agg =
>> + SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port.aggregator;
>> +
>> + if (agg &&
>> + agg->aggregator_identifier != ad_info.aggregator_id)
>> + continue;
>
> I think this could be:
>
> if (!(agg && agg->is_active))
> continue;
>
> Ben.
>
yes, thanks for this micro-optimization.
>> + }
>> +
>> + ni = rcu_dereference_bh(slave->dev->npinfo);
>> + if (down_trylock(&ni->dev_lock))
>> + continue;
>> + ops->ndo_poll_controller(slave->dev);
>> + up(&ni->dev_lock);
>> + }
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> }
>>
>> static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists