netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] mpls: Allow mpls_gso and mpls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y4n4kc09.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:17:42 -0500
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
Cc:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mpls: Allow mpls_gso and mpls_router to be built as modules

Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com> writes:

> CONFIG_MPLS=m doesn't result in a kernel module being built because it
> applies to the net/mpls directory, rather than to .o files.
>
> So revert the MPLS menuitem to being a boolean and make MPLS_GSO and
> MPLS_ROUTING tristates to allow mpls_gso and mpls_router modules to be
> produced as desired.

Good catch.  But I am pretty certain this does not result in the mpls
routing code in af_mpls being built as a module either.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html