netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] tcp_metrics: Add a field tcpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150310.132901.107747405992138134.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	ja@....bg, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com, vipin@...ulusnetworks.com,
	shmulik.ladkani@...il.com, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] tcp_metrics: Add a field tcpm_net and
 verify it matches on lookup

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:06:32 -0500

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
>> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:59:48 -0500
>>
>>> If we actually really care about struct net going away it would be
>>> much better to globally replace struct net with a typedef that looks
>>> something like:
>>> 
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
>>> struct net_ref {
>>>        struct net *net;
>>> };
>>> #else
>>> struct net_ref {
>>> };
>>> #endif
>>> typedef struct net_ref net_t;
>>> 
>>> That would remove the need for write_pnet and read_pnet, make it
>>> impossible to forget net_eq and make network namespace arguments to
>>> functions also boil away at compile time if the network namespace code
>>> was not enabled.
>>> 
>>> That was the original design and I forget why we didn't do that with
>>> struct net.  But we did not.
>>
>> This keeps the ifdefs out of foo.c code, so I like it.
> 
> Alright.  It does wind up requiring things like:

Another approach is to use a macro for the instantiation of a "struct
net *" member.

It could evaluate to "struct { } x;" when NETNS is disabled.

Then you don't need all the special accessors, read_pnet() and
write_pnet() are sufficient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html