[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550076B0.3090404@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:09:04 +0000
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...aro.org>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1 net] xen-netback: notify immediately after
pushing Tx response.
On 11/03/15 15:27, David Vrabel wrote:
> This fixes a performance regression introduced by
> 7fbb9d8415d4a51cf542e87cf3a717a9f7e6aedc (xen-netback: release pending
> index before pushing Tx responses)
>
> Moving the notify outside of the spin locks means it can be delayed a
> long time (if the dealloc thread is descheduled or there is an
> interrupt or softirq).
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Reviewed-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index c4d68d7..7f8a466 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static void xenvif_idx_release(struct xenvif_queue *queue, u16 pending_idx,
> static void make_tx_response(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
> struct xen_netif_tx_request *txp,
> s8 st);
> +static void push_tx_responses(struct xenvif_queue *queue);
>
> static inline int tx_work_todo(struct xenvif_queue *queue);
>
> @@ -655,15 +656,10 @@ static void xenvif_tx_err(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
> unsigned long flags;
>
> do {
> - int notify;
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->response_lock, flags);
> make_tx_response(queue, txp, XEN_NETIF_RSP_ERROR);
> - RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&queue->tx, notify);
> + push_tx_responses(queue);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->response_lock, flags);
> - if (notify)
> - notify_remote_via_irq(queue->tx_irq);
> -
> if (cons == end)
> break;
> txp = RING_GET_REQUEST(&queue->tx, cons++);
> @@ -1655,7 +1651,6 @@ static void xenvif_idx_release(struct xenvif_queue *queue, u16 pending_idx,
> {
> struct pending_tx_info *pending_tx_info;
> pending_ring_idx_t index;
> - int notify;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> pending_tx_info = &queue->pending_tx_info[pending_idx];
> @@ -1671,12 +1666,9 @@ static void xenvif_idx_release(struct xenvif_queue *queue, u16 pending_idx,
> index = pending_index(queue->pending_prod++);
> queue->pending_ring[index] = pending_idx;
>
> - RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&queue->tx, notify);
> + push_tx_responses(queue);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->response_lock, flags);
> -
> - if (notify)
> - notify_remote_via_irq(queue->tx_irq);
> }
>
>
> @@ -1697,6 +1689,15 @@ static void make_tx_response(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
> queue->tx.rsp_prod_pvt = ++i;
> }
>
> +static void push_tx_responses(struct xenvif_queue *queue)
> +{
> + int notify;
> +
> + RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&queue->tx, notify);
> + if (notify)
> + notify_remote_via_irq(queue->tx_irq);
> +}
> +
> static struct xen_netif_rx_response *make_rx_response(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
> u16 id,
> s8 st,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists