[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150314053456.GT29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 05:34:56 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] bogus MSG_PEEK test in rxrpc_recvmsg()
[I would really like an ACK on that one from dhowells; it appears to be
quite straightforward, but...]
MSG_PEEK isn't passed to ->recvmsg() via msg->msg_flags; as the matter of
fact, neither the kernel users of rxrpc, nor the syscalls ever set that bit
in there. It gets passed via flags; in fact, another such check in the same
function is done correctly - as flags & MSG_PEEK.
It had been that way (effectively disabled) for 8 years, though, so the patch
needs beating up - that case had never been tested. If it is correct, it's
-stable fodder.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c
index a4f883e..b92bede 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-recvmsg.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
if (!skb) {
/* nothing remains on the queue */
if (copied &&
- (msg->msg_flags & MSG_PEEK || timeo == 0))
+ (flags & MSG_PEEK || timeo == 0))
goto out;
/* wait for a message to turn up */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists