[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2002983.Zu6fLi5xz6@debian64>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:17:56 +0100
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] drivers: wireless: carl9170: shrink carl9170_tx_info
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 06:55:32 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
> Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:37:25 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > its embededded inside rate_driver_data of the ieee80211_tx_info struct,
> > > which in turn is stored in skb->cb[].
> > >
> > > In order to shrink cb, we need to shrink ieee80211_tx_info which means
> > > to downsize all users first.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, one might be able to remove kref but
> > > its less intrusive/simpler to use u32 for timeout handling.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> > > ---
> > u32 jiffies... that's a lot of pointing (well not so much) and really
> > ugly casting (a lot). I guess it would be easier to just use a "per-queue"
> > timeout watchdog like almost everybody else. This way, the driver will
> > be ready for the next skb->cb shrink as well.
> >
> > carl9170_tx_ampdu_timeout can be completely removed.
>
> Maybe, but there is only so much I am willing to do with "compile
> tested only" patches...
well, reinventing jiffies_32 is just a ugly hack and not "intrusive/simpler"
than removing kref here.
Please try again. Don't worry about testing, I'm sure this is not a problem
and someone will test the patches with the hw on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms.
Regards,
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists