netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp_metrics: fix wrong lockdep annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1503162213040.2343@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:27:49 +0200 (EET)
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc:	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...allels.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp_metrics: fix wrong lockdep annotations


	Hello,

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Changes in tcp_metric hash table are protected by tcp_metrics_lock
> only, not by genl_mutex

	So, can we also use .parallel_ops = true in
tcp_metrics_nl_family ? Looks like commands do not use
genl_mutex in such case.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html