netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: skip __ipv6_select_ident when there is no skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150318143644.GE1743@kria>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:36:44 +0100
From:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, matt@...tgrant.net.nz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: skip __ipv6_select_ident when there is no
 skb_dst

2015-03-18, 10:25:43 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 10:15 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > 2015-03-18, 10:04:10 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> >> On 03/18/2015 09:52 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> >>> Matt Grant reported frequent crashes in ipv6_select_ident when
> >>> udp6_ufo_fragment is called from openvswitch on a skb that doesn't
> >>> have a dst_entry set.
> >>>
> >>> Skip __ipv6_select_ident in case of a NULL rt.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 0508c07f5e0c ("ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO segmentation if not set.")
> >>> Cc: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> >>> Reported-by: Matt Grant <matt@...tgrant.net.nz>
> >>> Tested-by: Matt Grant <matt@...tgrant.net.nz>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> >>> ---
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Hi Sabrina
> >>
> >> This would result in us using id 0 which is not what we want to do.
> >>
> >> In this case, udp6_ufo_fragment() should be calling ipv6_proxy_select_ident() so that
> >> the fragment id is properly generated.
> > 
> > Hi Vlad,
> > 
> > So, instead, something like this?  Or do you want to use
> > ipv6_proxy_select_ident even when we have a skb_dst?
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is what I was thinking...
> 
> -vlad

Okay, so:

diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
index ab889bb16b3c..be2c0ba82c85 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
@@ -112,11 +112,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		fptr = (struct frag_hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + unfrag_ip6hlen);
 		fptr->nexthdr = nexthdr;
 		fptr->reserved = 0;
-		if (skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id)
-			fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
-		else
-			ipv6_select_ident(fptr,
-					  (struct rt6_info *)skb_dst(skb));
+		if (!skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id)
+			ipv6_proxy_select_ident(skb);
+		fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
 
 		/* Fragment the skb. ipv6 header and the remaining fields of the
 		 * fragment header are updated in ipv6_gso_segment()


-- 
Sabrina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html