[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1426757990.10267.3.camel@mattgrant.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:39:50 +1300
From: Matt Grant <matt@...tgrant.net.nz>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: skip __ipv6_select_ident when there is no
skb_dst
Hi!
This fixes hard lock on 3.19.2 as well. Without it, machine drops dead -
hard locks - pretty quickly after boot.
Will try 4.0-rc4 tomorrow. 4.0-rc3 had same hard crash issues.
Get it out there, this is a IPv6 network Packet of Death! We need
3.19.3 ASAP I think.
I'll try and see if I can get a network trace of the cause on Saturday.
Regards,
Matt
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 15:36 +0100, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2015-03-18, 10:25:43 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> > On 03/18/2015 10:15 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > > 2015-03-18, 10:04:10 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> > >> On 03/18/2015 09:52 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > >>> Matt Grant reported frequent crashes in ipv6_select_ident when
> > >>> udp6_ufo_fragment is called from openvswitch on a skb that doesn't
> > >>> have a dst_entry set.
> > >>>
> > >>> Skip __ipv6_select_ident in case of a NULL rt.
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: 0508c07f5e0c ("ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO segmentation if not set.")
> > >>> Cc: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> > >>> Reported-by: Matt Grant <matt@...tgrant.net.nz>
> > >>> Tested-by: Matt Grant <matt@...tgrant.net.nz>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> > >>> ---
> > >> [...]
> > >>
> > >> Hi Sabrina
> > >>
> > >> This would result in us using id 0 which is not what we want to do.
> > >>
> > >> In this case, udp6_ufo_fragment() should be calling ipv6_proxy_select_ident() so that
> > >> the fragment id is properly generated.
> > >
> > > Hi Vlad,
> > >
> > > So, instead, something like this? Or do you want to use
> > > ipv6_proxy_select_ident even when we have a skb_dst?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, this is what I was thinking...
> >
> > -vlad
>
> Okay, so:
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> index ab889bb16b3c..be2c0ba82c85 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> @@ -112,11 +112,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb,
> fptr = (struct frag_hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + unfrag_ip6hlen);
> fptr->nexthdr = nexthdr;
> fptr->reserved = 0;
> - if (skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id)
> - fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
> - else
> - ipv6_select_ident(fptr,
> - (struct rt6_info *)skb_dst(skb));
> + if (!skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id)
> + ipv6_proxy_select_ident(skb);
> + fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
>
> /* Fragment the skb. ipv6 header and the remaining fields of the
> * fragment header are updated in ipv6_gso_segment()
>
>
--
Matt Grant, Debian and Linux Systems Administration and Consulting
Mobile: 021 0267 0578
Email: matt@...tgrant.net.nz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists