[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150320120228.GA18736@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:02:28 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v1 PATCH 2/7] rhashtable: Allow hash/comparison functions to be
inlined
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:20:42AM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> I haven't checked in detail yet whether this still satisfies what
> we need in nftables, just a minor comment below:
AFAIK I have done nothing to break multiple keys as yet and
the comparison function is still there, just embedded into the
params structure.
> > +struct rhashtable_compare_arg {
> > + struct rhashtable *ht;
> > + const void *key;
> > +};
>
> I found it a bit odd in the old interface that elementary data
> such as the key for comparision is encapsulated into a structure
> instead of passed as a function argument. Is there a reason
> for not passing both as arguments so we can at least avoid the
> encapsulation for the common case?
I don't have any objections against changing it but it could
be done outside of this particular patch-set.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists