[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3606797.04xNxe9kJh@storm>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:58 +0100
From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com>
To: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
'Linux Netdev List' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
e1000-devel <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang"
Hi Aaron,
On Saturday, 21. February 2015 01:59:35 Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> Thanks, that (and the multiple bug write-ups on sourceforge) gave me more
> than enough to go on. I was able to replicate it on a handful of systems
> in my lab. On effected systems setting up a NAT and stressing the
> interfaces with even moderate traffic levels triggers it pretty quickly.
> It appears that the NAT part is unnecessary, just setting the systems up
> as a software router and running some traffic across it also triggers it
> giving the same apparent behavior (tx hang, watchdog timeout trace, port
> reset.)
>
> And with an internal reproduction of the issue I have created an internal
> bug report, described my set of reproductions, referenced the similar
> external ones and assigned it to our current e1000e developer.
just wanted to quickly check if there has been any progress
since the internal bug report has been filed?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists