netdev - Re: [PATCH resend] Renesas Ethernet AVB driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:40:34 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, richardcochran@...il.com
CC:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	galak@...eaurora.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, mitsuhiro.kimura.kc@...esas.com,
	masaru.nagai.vx@...esas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] Renesas Ethernet AVB driver

Hello.

On 03/31/2015 06:38 PM, David Miller wrote:

>>>> We also need SOB from Mitsuhiro and Masaru.

>>>     Hmm, it's the first time I encounter such requirement.

>> I think this is normal policy.  I have seen it more than once on lkml.
>> The reason for the author's SOB is to make sure that he or she is
>> really authorized (like from the employer) to contribute the driver.

    We (Cogent Embedded) are authorized to do this, isn't this enough?

>> [adding davem on CC]

>> Dave, is that correct?

> I refuse to apply any patch without an appropriate signoff.

    But what do you mean by "appropriate signoff"? I have provided mine but 
Richard insists there should be sign-offs from the primary driver authors -- 
it's the first time I'm encountering such a requirement.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html