netdev - Re: [PATCH ethtool 2/5] ethtool: Add missing Advertised speeds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1428199999.11260.138.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 05 Apr 2015 03:13:19 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	Eyal Perry <eyalpe@...lanox.com>,
	Eyal Grossman <eyalgr@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool 2/5] ethtool: Add missing Advertised speeds

On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 02:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 15:51 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> > From: Eyal Grossman <eyalgr@...lanox.com>
> > 
> > Added the following missing advertised speed modes:
> > - ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full
> > - ADVERTISED_56000baseKR4_Full
> > - ADVERTISED_56000baseCR4_Full
> > - ADVERTISED_56000baseSR4_Full
> > - ADVERTISED_56000baseLR4_Full
> > - ADVERTISED_10000baseKX4_Full
> > 
> > In order to reduce code duplication we added a macro to
> > ALL_ADVERTISED_FLAGS in line 88 ALL_ADVERTISED_MODES,
> > in addition the changed we made added speed that were
> > missing from ALL_ADVERTISED_MODES
> > (e.g. ADVERTISED_10000baseKX4_Full).
> 
> Well spotted.
> 
> > Added ADVERTISED_10000baseR_FEC to mode_defs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eyal Grossman <eyalgr@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
> > ---
> [...]
> > @@ -527,15 +516,20 @@ dump_link_caps(const char *prefix, const char *an_prefix, u32 mask,
> >  		{ 1, ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full,     "1000baseT/Full" },
> >  		{ 0, ADVERTISED_1000baseKX_Full,    "1000baseKX/Full" },
> >  		{ 0, ADVERTISED_2500baseX_Full,     "2500baseX/Full" },
> > -		{ 0, ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full,    "10000baseT/Full" },
> > +		{ 1, ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full,    "10000baseT/Full" },
> 
> Why should this be on the same line as 2500baseX/Full?
> 
> >  		{ 0, ADVERTISED_10000baseKX4_Full,  "10000baseKX4/Full" },
> >  		{ 0, ADVERTISED_10000baseKR_Full,   "10000baseKR/Full" },
> > +		{ 0, ADVERTISED_10000baseR_FEC,     "10000baseR/FEC" },
> 
> This is not a link mode, it's a separate capability that applies to all
> 10GBASE-R modes.  It's also meaningful for 40G and 100G modes despite
> the way we've named the flags.  Please put it in a separate section
> below the link modes.

I've applied this without the two bits I commented on.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)