[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552435EA.6010609@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:54:18 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
rl@...lgate.ch, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] via-rhine: commit receive buffer address
before descriptor status update.
On 04/06/2015 11:01 AM, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
> index a191afc..00fea3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
> @@ -2063,6 +2063,7 @@ static int rhine_rx(struct net_device *dev, int limit)
> break;
> }
> rp->rx_ring[entry].addr = cpu_to_le32(rp->rx_skbuff_dma[entry]);
> + wmb();
> }
> rp->rx_ring[entry].rx_status = cpu_to_le32(DescOwn);
> }
Do you need a full wmb() here or would a dma_wmb() be enough? It could
make a difference on some processor architectures.
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists