| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1504091731410.14110@nerf40.vanv.qr> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 17:35:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> cc: Linux Networking Developer Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: TSO on veth device slows transmission to a crawl On Thursday 2015-04-09 17:08, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> > >> >Basic IP routing seems not properly enabled, as even ping does not work >> >to reach 10.10.23.23 >> >> Since I have net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding,net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 >> this probably got inherited into the containers, so I did not >> write it down into the scripts. >> Enable it :) > >The thing is : It is enabled. If forwarding is on, and the config is reasonably correct (which I think it is), and it still won't ping, then would that not mean there is another bug in the kernel? >> >Have you tried net-next as well ? >> >> I have now - a quick test yields no problem. Next I will do a reverse >> bisect just for the fun. > >Cool ;) I've aborted the search. v4.0-rc crashes in a VM http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142850643415538&w=2 , and on a real system, the SCSI layer similarly acts up in 4.0rc5 such that sda won't even show up in the first place. If large portions of the history don't be booted, I can't bisect it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists