[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150422.141534.1363191163633903371.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:15:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: johunt@...mai.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
gthelen@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix possible deadlock in tcp_send_fin()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:32:24 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Using sk_stream_alloc_skb() in tcp_send_fin() is dangerous in
> case a huge process is killed by OOM, and tcp_mem[2] is hit.
>
> To be able to free memory we need to make progress, so this
> patch allows FIN packets to not care about tcp_mem[2], if
> skb allocation succeeded.
>
> In a follow-up patch, we might abort tcp_send_fin() infinite loop
> in case TIF_MEMDIE is set on this thread, as memory allocator
> did its best getting extra memory already.
>
> This patch reverts d22e15371811 ("tcp: fix tcp fin memory accounting")
>
> Fixes: d22e15371811 ("tcp: fix tcp fin memory accounting")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, since the tcp fin memory accounting change
went to -stable already.
Wrt. longer term solutions, I would even be OK at this point aborting
the connection altogether if the skb allocation fails period. Not
just if TIF_MEMDIE is set. That endless loop has been nothing but
trouble.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists