[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150430091914.32385c0f@urahara>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:19:14 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@...ic.de>
Cc: Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ss: Fix wrong filter behaviour
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:22:13 +0200
Mihai Moldovan <ionic@...ic.de> wrote:
> On 28.04.2015 03:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:16:48PM +0300, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >> From: Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Fixed applying family & socket type filters.
> >> It was not possible to select UDP & UNIX sockets together.
> >>
> >> Now selected families are ORed.
> >>
> >> The problem was that filters were combined by AND.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@...il.com>
> >> Reported-By: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@...ic.de>
> >> ---
> >> misc/ss.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/misc/ss.c b/misc/ss.c
> >> index 954a30b..46dbb39 100644
> >> [...]
> >
> > Would you please respond if you received this patch ?
> > I am just checking, in case if it was get into 'Spam' list.
> >
> > Regards,
>
> I finally came around to testing this, sorry it took me so long.
>
> Using that patch, the output looks much better. It works for my use case.
>
> What do we do with the "broken" versions, though? Even if that patch hits 4.1.0,
> older versions like 4.0.0, 3.19.0 etc. will still be broken?
I could put out a 4.0.1 but usually reserve doing maintenance releases for serious bugs
like security problems.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists