lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 03 May 2015 23:29:55 +0900
From:	Hajime Tazaki <tazaki@....wide.ad.jp>
To:	kafai@...com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	steffen.klassert@...unet.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	yangyingliang@...wei.com, shengyong1@...wei.com, Kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] ipv6: Stop /128 route from disappearing after pmtu update


Hi,

At Sat, 2 May 2015 20:38:01 -0700,
Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> 
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 09:19:47AM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> > - 'ip -6 r show' at the ping6 sender
> > 2001:1::/64 dev sim0  proto kernel  metric 256 
> > fe80::/64 dev sim0  proto kernel  metric 256 
> > 
> > # the results of ip command on receiver side are almost
> >   similar.
> > 
> > I found that the test uses non-ARP interface between nodes:
> > if I changed the interface to 'non-NOARP' NIC, the issue has
> > gone away without the revert.
> I have given a little more thoughts.  With the below partial patch
> ruled out and together with a /64 route in your test,
> I failed to see how another line change could have broken.
> 
> Can you share some more details on your test and

the test uses two nodes (running on ns-3 network simulator
with net-next kernel), which is connected via a
point-to-point data link: payload is encapsulated by PPP
(RFC1661).

https://www.nsnam.org/docs/models/html/point-to-point.html

so there is no need of neighbor resolution (ARP, NS/NA) on
that link (dev->flags has IFF_NOARP and IFF_POINTOPOINT bits).

             point-to-point
   node 0  <---------------> node 1
2001:1::1/64               2001:1::2/64

let me know if you need further information.

> can you reproduce it with some basic iproute2 commands?

I'm going to create a real environment to figure out a
minimum-reproducible command set that we can try.

do you have any chance to create an interface with IFF_NOARP
and IFF_POINTOPOINT (some tunnel device ?) on the latest
net-next kernel ?


-- Hajime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists