[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150503190108.GF2731450@devbig242.prn2.facebook.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 12:01:09 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Hajime Tazaki <tazaki@....wide.ad.jp>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<yangyingliang@...wei.com>, <shengyong1@...wei.com>,
<Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] ipv6: Stop /128 route from disappearing
after pmtu update
Hi Hajime,
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:29:55PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> the test uses two nodes (running on ns-3 network simulator
> with net-next kernel), which is connected via a
> point-to-point data link: payload is encapsulated by PPP
> (RFC1661).
>
> so there is no need of neighbor resolution (ARP, NS/NA) on
> that link (dev->flags has IFF_NOARP and IFF_POINTOPOINT bits).
>
> point-to-point
> node 0 <---------------> node 1
> 2001:1::1/64 2001:1::2/64
>
> let me know if you need further information.
Thanks for the details and confirming the last patch. I think I may
know what could be wrong. I am going to confirm it first by trying
to reproduce it.
> I'm going to create a real environment to figure out a
> minimum-reproducible command set that we can try.
That will be great!
> do you have any chance to create an interface with IFF_NOARP
> and IFF_POINTOPOINT (some tunnel device ?) on the latest
> net-next kernel ?
I am going to give it a try.
Thanks,
--Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists