[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150508232236.GO14981@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 19:22:36 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] geneve: add initial netdev driver for GENEVE tunnels
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:55:15PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:20 AM, John W. Linville
> <linville@...driver.com> wrote:
> > +
> > +/* Setup stats when device is created */
> > +static int geneve_init(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct geneve_dev *geneve = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +
> > + dev->tstats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct pcpu_sw_netstats);
> > + if (!dev->tstats)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* make new socket outside of RTNL */
> > + dev_hold(dev);
> > + queue_work(geneve_wq, &geneve->sock_work);
> > +
>
>
> Any reason to create socket in this init() rather than in ndo_open()?
The socket can be created asynchronously and ndo_open can fail if
the socket creation hasn't succeeded.
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void geneve_uninit(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct geneve_dev *geneve = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct geneve_sock *gs = geneve->sock;
> > +
> > + if (gs)
> > + geneve_sock_release(gs);
> > + free_percpu(dev->tstats);
> > +}
>
>
> Ditto, ndo_stop().
I really don't see the point of the ndo_open/ndo_stop inquiry.
The socket creation seems analagous to device initialization to me.
> > +
> > +static int geneve_newlink(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
> > +{
> ...
> > +
> > + if (data[IFLA_GENEVE_REMOTE])
> > + geneve->remote.sin_addr.s_addr =
> > + nla_get_be32(data[IFLA_GENEVE_REMOTE]);
>
>
> nla_get_in_addr()
The implementation of that is (not surprisingly) exactly the same
as nla_get_be32. I'll take it under advisement for a later patch,
but I don't really think a purely cosmetic change should interfere
with getting this merged.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists