netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: move qdisc ingress filtering code where it belongs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 10 May 2015 22:40:08 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: move qdisc ingress filtering code where
 it belongs

On 05/10/2015 08:47 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> You've read the patch in a way that it slows down netif_receive
> _without_ ingress qdisc? Of course, that's not the case.
>
> Here are the number from my box:
> before:
> no ingress - 37.6
> ingress on other dev - 36.5
> ingress on this dev - 28.8
> ingress on this dev + u32 - 24.1
>
> after Daniel's two patches:
> no ingress - 37.6
> ingress on other dev - 36.5
> ingress on this dev - 36.5
> ingress on this dev + u32 - 25.2
>
> so when ingress qdisc is not used, the difference is zero.
> When ingress qdisc is added to another device - difference is zero.
> The last two numbers that we wanted to accelerate and we did.

+1, exactly!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html