[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150510195018.GA7877@salvia>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 21:50:18 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: move qdisc ingress filtering code
where it belongs
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:37:10PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 5/10/15 12:20 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]
> Another non-technical 'guess' ?
>
> baseline with Daniel's two patches:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 10605509 1885208 1400832 13891549 d3f7dd vmlinux
>
> then with:
> -static inline struct sk_buff *handle_ing(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +static noinline struct sk_buff *handle_ing(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 10605572 1885208 1400832 13891612 d3f81c vmlinux
>
> so not inlining handle_ing() actually may have an impact on everyone,
> because .text gets bigger. Though only marginally.
>
> btw, after removing 'inline' keyword gcc still inlines it automatically
> and looking at the above numbers gcc is doing the right call.
Please, stop this.
The numbers show that the existing approach and your approach results
in less performance for everyone that don't need to filter from
ingress. We have to move ingress to where it belongs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists