netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: net: add JIT support for loads from struct seccomp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150510194028.GA2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 10 May 2015 20:40:28 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	nschichan@...ebox.fr, dborkman@...hat.com, ast@...mgrid.com,
	mgherzan@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: net: add JIT support for loads from struct
 seccomp_data.

On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:28:58PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
> Date: Thu,  7 May 2015 15:00:13 +0200
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
> > ---
> > 
> > This patch was first sent as part of a serie modifying the core
> > seccomp code to allow the use of the classic BPF JIT. As the core
> > changes have been submitted to netdev by Daniel Borkmann, it is now
> > time to re-submit this patch separately.
> > 
> > While not physically dependent of the core seccomp changes they are
> > needed for the code added in this patch to be triggered.
> 
> Where would you like this to be applied, my tree?
> 
> This is an ongoing situation, where people have traditionally not
> consistently wanted bpf JIT patches to go into the networking tree.
> 
> So I beg everyone posting such things to netdev to be _clear_
> and _explicit_ about whether you expect me to integrate the patch
> or not.

I think you have taken previous ARM net JIT patches, so I think it
makes sense if you continue to do so.  I'm not knowledgable of the
JIT interface myself, all I can say about many of these patches is
that they look okay to me on a superficial basis.

I suspect you're doing more or less the same, but from a slightly
different perspective (presumably through not knowing ARM assembly.)

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html