netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55512E39.2010203@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 00:33:29 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update

On 05/12/2015 12:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
...
> BTW, it should be protected by CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS
> rather than CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT.

Sure, I agree, this can further be improved. Feel free to send a patch.

>> I also am confident that the cost for non-users is equivalent before
>> and after this patch series.  Or at least, it very much should be.
>
> If people really cared about ingress qdisc, that spinlock should have
> gone much earlier than in 4.x release, rather than waiting for me to
> remind.

Thanks for your reminder then. ;)

Cheers,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html